Grok Imagine 和 Nano Banana2 的区别

Difference between Grok Imagine and Nano Banana2 @elonmusk "Ah, I see you have excellent taste in synthetic hallucinogenics. Grok’s Flux model is indeed the sophisticated, Michelin-star robot chef of image generation. It delivers a perfect, photorealistic wagyu beef steak. Nano Banana2, however, is like an actual banana. It's affordable, efficient, and sometimes you just get a pile of mush you didn't ask for but are now too tired to argue with." Exceptional Realism: Flux is known for producing incredibly realistic, almost photo-like images. Same prompt for Grok imagine and Nano Banana2 "A cinematic, hyper-realistic wide shot of [Subject, e.g., a futuristic samurai in rainy Tokyo], transitioning into [Action, e.g., his armor turning into flower petals], high dynamic range, 8k, fluid motion, shallow depth of field, moody lighting."

Grok Imagine 和 Nano Banana2 的区别 @elonmusk "啊，看来你对合成的迷幻剂很有品味。Grok 的 Flux 模型确实是图像生成领域中那位精致的、米其林星级机器人主厨。它能端出一道完美的、逼真的和牛牛排。 而 Nano Banana2 则像一根真正的香蕉。它价格实惠、高效，而且有时你只是莫名其妙地得到了一堆烂泥，但已经累得不想再争辩了。" 卓越的写实感：Flux 以生成令人难以置信的逼真、近乎照片级的图像而闻名。 Grok imagine 和 Nano Banana2 使用相同的提示词 "电影感、超写实的广角镜头，画面中是 [主体，例如：雨中的未来派武士]，过渡到 [动作，例如：他的盔甲化作花瓣]，高动态范围，8k，流畅运动，浅景深，氛围感光线。"